Aspark Owl
Quad-motor electric
Full specification →Type to search · ↑↓ to move · Enter to open · Esc to close
The Aspark Owl has the power advantage — 1,980 hp against 1,888, a margin of 92 hp. Power-to-weight tells the more useful story: 1042 against 878 hp per tonne, which puts the Aspark Owl ahead on the figure that actually decides how a car feels. Flat out the Rimac Nevera goes further, 258 mph against 249. Off the line the Aspark Owl is quicker, 1.72 s to 60 mph against 1.85. At launch the Rimac Nevera was the cheaper of the two, $2,200,000 against $3,200,000.
| Aspark Owl | Rimac Nevera | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,980 hp | 1,888 hp |
| Top speed | 249 mph | 258 mph |
| 0–60 mph | 1.72 s | 1.85 s |
| Kerb weight | 1,900 kg | 2,150 kg |
| Power-to-weight | 1042 hp/t | 878 hp/t |
| Powertrain | Electric | Electric |
| Produced | 2020–present | 2021–present |
A green figure is the better of the two. Manufacturer-stated throughout.
Quad-motor electric
Full specification →Quad-motor electric
Full specification →